18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
5
6
10
Best position
#7
#4
#2
Average position
13.0
19.0
6.0
Latest test
2022
2020
2026
Available sizes
676
129
104

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry driving behavior
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Fuel efficiency
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison