18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
5
1
15
Best position
#7
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
1.0
9.0
Latest test
2022
2025
2025
Available sizes
676
64
225

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Dry driving behavior
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Fuel efficiency
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Price/value
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison