18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
5
1
10
Best position
#7
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
1.0
6.0
Latest test
2022
2025
2026
Available sizes
676
64
104

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison