18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
5
8
10
Best position
#7
#4
#2
Average position
13.0
12.8
6.0
Latest test
2022
2024
2026
Available sizes
676
30
104

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison