18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Firestone
Roadhawk
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
5
21
1
Best position
#7
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
11.9
1.0
Latest test
2022
2024
2025
Available sizes
676
164
64

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry driving behavior
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Fuel efficiency
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Price/value
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison