18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Firestone
Roadhawk
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
21
3
Best position
#7
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
11.9
3.7
Latest test
2022
2024
2025
Available sizes
676
164
34

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry driving behavior
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Fuel efficiency
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Price/value
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison