18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
6
3
Best position
#7
#3
#2
Average position
13.0
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2022
2026
2025
Available sizes
676
146
34

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison