18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
5
3
6
Best position
#7
#2
#3
Average position
13.0
3.7
4.7
Latest test
2022
2025
2026
Available sizes
676
34
146

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dry lane changing
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison