18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
5
14
10
3
Best position
#7
#1
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
3.6
6.0
3.3
Latest test
2022
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
676
188
104
40

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet performance
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry driving behavior
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry lane changing
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry performance
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Price/value
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison