18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Continental EcoContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

EcoContact 6

R13 – R23
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Also compare with
Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
5
14
14
3
Best position
#7
#1
#8
#2
Average position
13.0
3.6
13.4
3.3
Latest test
2022
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
676
188
153
40

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet performance
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry driving behavior
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry lane changing
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry performance
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Fuel efficiency
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Price/value
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison