18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Dunlop Winter

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dunlop
Winter
Number of tests
5
23
2
Best position
#7
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
6.7
1.5
Latest test
2022
2025
2025
Available sizes
676
107
65

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Dunlop Winter
71%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Dunlop Winter
64%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Price/value
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Dunlop Winter
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison