18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Sava Intensa HP vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Sava
Intensa HP
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
14
4
4
18
3
Best position
#1
#8
#3
#1
#2
Average position
3.8
13.5
12.0
6.1
3.3
Latest test
2019
2018
2025
2024
2026
Available sizes
35
59
111
47
40

Wet

Wet
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Sava Intensa HP
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Sava Intensa HP
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Sava Intensa HP
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet side guide
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Sava Intensa HP
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry driving behavior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Sava Intensa HP
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry lane changing
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Costs

Costs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Sava Intensa HP
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Sava Intensa HP
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Fuel efficiency
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
Sava Intensa HP
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Rolling resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Sava Intensa HP
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Interior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Sava Intensa HP
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison