18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Sava Intensa HP vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Sava
Intensa HP
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
4
3
Best position
#1
#8
#2
Average position
3.8
13.5
3.7
Latest test
2019
2018
2025
Available sizes
35
59
34

Wet

Wet
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Sava Intensa HP
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Sava Intensa HP
88%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Sava Intensa HP
67%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Sava Intensa HP
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry driving behavior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Sava Intensa HP
74%
Dry handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Costs

Costs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Sava Intensa HP
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Sava Intensa HP
80%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Fuel efficiency
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
Sava Intensa HP
82%
Rolling resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Sava Intensa HP
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Sava Intensa HP
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison