18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
4
3
6
3
Best position
#1
#3
#2
#3
#2
Average position
3.8
12.0
3.3
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
35
111
40
146
34

Wet

Wet
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry driving behavior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry lane changing
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Costs

Costs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Fuel efficiency
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison