18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
14
4
3
5
3
Best position
#1
#3
#2
#1
#2
Average position
3.8
12.0
3.7
2.2
3.3
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
35
111
34
63
40

Wet

Wet
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Wet braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet side guide
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry driving behavior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry lane changing
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry steering response
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Costs

Costs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Fuel efficiency
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Interior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison