18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
15
3
Best position
#1
#2
#2
Average position
3.8
9.0
3.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
35
225
34

Wet

Wet
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Dry

Dry
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry driving behavior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Dry handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Costs

Costs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Fuel efficiency
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Rolling resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Price/value
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
35%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison