18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
10
3
Best position
#1
#2
#2
Average position
3.8
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
35
104
34

Wet

Wet
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry driving behavior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Dry handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Costs

Costs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison