18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test Profile

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Number of tests
14
11
3
18
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.8
11.6
3.3
6.1
Latest test
2019
2024
2026
2024
Available sizes
35
121
40
47

Wet

Wet
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Wet handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Wet braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Wet circle cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Wet side guide
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Dry

Dry
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Dry driving behavior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Dry braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Costs

Costs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Fuel efficiency
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Rolling resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Price/value
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
35%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Exterior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Interior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison