18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Continental ContiPremiumContact 5Premium
ContinentalContinental

ContiPremiumContact 5

R14 – R17
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
3
26
3
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#2
Average position
3.8
3.3
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
35
40
66
34

Wet

Wet
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry driving behavior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry steering response
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry lane changing
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Costs

Costs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Fuel efficiency
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Rolling resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Price/value
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
35%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison