18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
18
3
3
3
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
3.8
6.1
4.7
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2019
2024
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
35
47
126
40
34

Wet

Wet
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry driving behavior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry lane changing
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Costs

Costs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Fuel efficiency
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Rolling resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison