18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Maxxis Premitra HP5

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

In the realm of summer tyres, two notable models stand out: the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 and the Firestone Roadhawk. Both tires have distinctive strengths and weaknesses which we will examine based on comprehensive test data.


First, let's take a look at the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5. Made in the Czech Republic, this model boasts impressive performance in several areas. Strong points include significant resistance to aquaplaning and lower interior noise. In the ADAC test, it ranked 3rd out of 16 total tyres, and in the Autobild test, it had a respectable 5th place out of 51 tyres. However, it's important to note that the ContiPremiumContact 5 has since been replaced by the Continental PremiumContact 6.


Next, we look at the Firestone Roadhawk. From the data we have, it seems to excel in dry driving behavior, safety, and wet braking, positioning it firmly in 4th place in the ADAC test and earning it an impressive 3rd place in the Autobild test. It holds an overall rating of 59%. There is currently no newer tyre that replaced this model, making it a viable choice for those consider, Firestone's summer tyre range.


In terms of test rankings, both tyres perform commendably with the Firestone Roadhawk having a slight edge in the Autobild test. While the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 and Firestone Roadhawk have their respective strengths, it appears that the Roadhawk has a broader range of strong points, namely: dry driving behavior, safety, and wet braking, which are crucial for summer road conditions.


Ultimately, the choice between the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 and the Firestone Roadhawk comes down to individual driving preferences, conditions, and requirements. While the Continental tyre shines for its resistance to aquaplaning and hushed interior noise, the Firestone tyre stands out for its safety attributes and balanced behavior in both wet and dry conditions.

Test Profile

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Firestone
Roadhawk
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Number of tests
14
21
31
Best position
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.8
11.9
9.5
Latest test
2019
2024
2024
Available sizes
35
164
64

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Maxxis Premitra HP5
89%
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Wet Handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
94%
Firestone Roadhawk
98%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
94%
Wet Circle Cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
89%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
92%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
89%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
90%
Aquaplaning Cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
81%
Dry Performance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
96%
Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Maxxis Premitra HP5
97%
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Dry Handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
96%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
97%
Comfort & Noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
82%
Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Firestone Roadhawk
22%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Maxxis Premitra HP5
79%
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Noise Exterior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
22%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
79%
Economy
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Maxxis Premitra HP5
55%
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Rolling Resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
51%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
66%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
43%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2018195/65 R15View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison