18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
6
3
Best position
#1
#3
#2
Average position
3.8
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
35
146
34

Wet

Wet
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry driving behavior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Dry handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry lane changing
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Costs

Costs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison