18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
14
3
6
Best position
#1
#2
#3
Average position
3.8
3.7
4.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
35
34
146

Wet

Wet
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%

Dry

Dry
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry driving behavior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Dry handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dry braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dry lane changing
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%

Costs

Costs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rolling resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Interior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison