18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Continental ContiPremiumContact 5Premium
ContinentalContinental

ContiPremiumContact 5

R14 – R17
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Firestone RoadhawkUpper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Also compare with
Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
14
14
21
3
Best position
#1
#8
#2
#2
Average position
3.8
13.4
11.9
3.3
Latest test
2019
2026
2024
2026
Available sizes
35
153
164
40

Wet

Wet
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Wet braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet side guide
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry driving behavior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Costs

Costs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Fuel efficiency
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Rolling resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Price/value
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
35%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Interior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison