• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Continental (73%). In this particular case, the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 has a better rating of 77% compared to 58% of the Continental AllSeasonContact. The first tyre test of Continental AllSeasonContact was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/50 R18 test, where both the AllSeasonContact and the Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Continental AllSeasonContact dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 also have B wet ratings. We also know where AllSeasonContact is made - Slovakia/Czech Republic/France.

# Continental AllSeasonContact
/58%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3
/77%

Add to comparison

Continental
GoodYear
DimensionsR13 - R20 R19 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

2

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test2+2+2+
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: Good
2+ 2-1-
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3
Rating: Good
221-
Show test details
Gute-Fahrt
Name
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: Very good
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3
Rating: Very good
Show test details