Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Continental (73%). In this particular case, the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 has a better rating of 77% compared to 58% of the Continental AllSeasonContact. The first tyre test of Continental AllSeasonContact was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/50 R18 test, where both the AllSeasonContact and the Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Continental AllSeasonContact dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 also have B wet ratings. We also know where AllSeasonContact is made - Slovakia/Czech Republic/France.
| # | Continental AllSeasonContact
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R19 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Very good
2. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 1- | ||||
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Very good | |||||||
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||