Segment
2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs. Linglong Sport Master 4S
Table of contents:
| # | Continental AllSeasonContact 2
| Linglong Sport Master 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
This head-to-head comparison of the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and the Linglong Sport Master 4S summarizes independent test results and gives a clear verdict on strengths and weaknesses. For manufacturer details see Continental and Linglong. Neither model has been replaced by a newer version according to our data.
Overall test score: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 — 88% vs Linglong Sport Master 4S — 61%. The gap is reflected in comparative test positions: in the Autobild test (15 tyres) the AllSeasonContact 2 finished 2nd while the Sport Master 4S placed 14th. These rankings, together with detailed sub-scores, indicate a clear performance advantage for the Continental across multiple conditions.
Summary of test findings
- Wet performance: Continental scores very well in wet braking and wet handling (Autobild highlights wet braking and wet handling among its best features). Linglong offers respectable wet handling in some tests, but overall wet performance is inconsistent compared with the Continental.
- Snow and winter behaviour: Continental is praised for snow traction, snow handling and snow cornering — key reasons for its high ranking. Linglong shows noticeable weaknesses in the snow that limited its overall results (Autobild specifically cites slight snow weaknesses).
- Dry performance: Continental delivers balanced dry handling and driving dynamics. Linglong can provide decent dry handling and braking in budget terms, but it cannot match Continental’s overall grip and stability.
- Comfort and rolling resistance: Both tyres score positively for comfort and rolling resistance in various tests. Linglong is highlighted as a “kilometerfresser” (good for mileage) and cost-efficient, while Continental combines low rolling resistance with a comfortable ride and better all-around dynamics.
Strengths and weaknesses
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Strengths: outstanding all-round balance, excellent performance on wet and snowy roads, strong dry handling and comfortable ride. Tests also note low rolling resistance, contributing to economy. Weakness: slightly reduced mileage longevity compared with some budget rivals (Autobild mentions slightly limited kilometer performance).
Linglong Sport Master 4S
Strengths: low purchase price, good value for mileage and comfort. Performs adequately on dry roads and shows some merit in wet handling in isolated tests. Weaknesses: marked limitations on snow and — in comparative testing — inconsistent performance that results in a low overall ranking (14/15 in Autobild). These weaknesses prevent the Sport Master 4S from achieving a competitive all-season result.
Which tyre is better overall?
Based on aggregate test data, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is the superior choice for drivers seeking a true all-season performer: it consistently ranks near the top in mixed conditions and scores highly for wet, snow and dry handling. The Linglong Sport Master 4S is an economical option that may suit drivers prioritizing purchase cost and mileage, but it trails the Continental significantly in mixed-condition safety and handling tests.
Quick links: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 4.2 | 1– | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | ||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | 1.2 | 1– | 2+ | 2 | 1– | ||
| Linglong Sport Master 4S Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3.3 | 3 | 2 | 2+ | 3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Linglong Sport Master 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Linglong Sport Master 4S Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
