Comparison: Ceat WinterDrive vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Ceat

WinterDrive

6.4

R13 – R18

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

WinterDrive

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

Number of tests

4

3

1

14

3

Best position

#10

#2

#1

#2

Average position

17.0

3.3

1.0

3.6

3.7

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

37

40

64

188

34

Wet

Ceat WinterDrive

27%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Ceat WinterDrive

9%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Ceat WinterDrive

25%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Ceat WinterDrive

2%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Ceat WinterDrive

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Ceat WinterDrive

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet performance

Ceat WinterDrive

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Snow

Ceat WinterDrive

54%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow traction

Ceat WinterDrive

35%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Snow braking

Ceat WinterDrive

39%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Snow handling

Ceat WinterDrive

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow cornering

Ceat WinterDrive

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Costs

Ceat WinterDrive

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Ceat WinterDrive

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Price/value

Ceat WinterDrive

92%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dry

Ceat WinterDrive

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry performance

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Dry handling

Ceat WinterDrive

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Exterior noise

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Ceat WinterDrive vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

WinterDrive

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison