18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Ceat WinterDrive vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Ceat
WinterDrive
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
4
3
3
5
17
Best position
#10
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
17.0
3.3
3.7
2.2
1.7
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
37
40
34
63
80

Wet

Wet
Ceat WinterDrive
27%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet braking
Ceat WinterDrive
25%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Ceat WinterDrive
2%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Aquaplaning - cross
Ceat WinterDrive
9%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Wet circle cornering
Ceat WinterDrive
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Wet handling
Ceat WinterDrive
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%

Snow

Snow
Ceat WinterDrive
54%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow traction
Ceat WinterDrive
35%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Snow braking
Ceat WinterDrive
39%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow handling
Ceat WinterDrive
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%

Costs

Costs
Ceat WinterDrive
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Rolling resistance
Ceat WinterDrive
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%

Dry

Dry
Ceat WinterDrive
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Dry handling
Ceat WinterDrive
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Ceat WinterDrive
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Comfort
Ceat WinterDrive
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Exterior noise
Ceat WinterDrive
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%

Ice

Ice
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison