18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Ceat WinterDrive vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Ceat) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Ceat (68%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 81% compared to 64% of the Ceat WinterDrive. The first tyre test of Ceat WinterDrive was done in 2024, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the WinterDrive and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

Test Profile

Ceat
WinterDrive
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Number of tests
4
23
Best position
#10
#1
Average position
17.0
6.7
Latest test
2025
2025
Available sizes
37
107

Wet

Wet
Ceat WinterDrive
27%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%

Snow

Snow
Ceat WinterDrive
54%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%

Costs

Costs
Ceat WinterDrive
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%

Dry

Dry
Ceat WinterDrive
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%

Comfort

Comfort
Ceat WinterDrive
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%

Ice

Ice
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2025225/40 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2025225/40 R18View
AUTOBILDAUTOBILD
Winter
2024205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison