Comparison: Ceat WinterDrive SUV vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Ceat

WinterDrive SUV

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

WinterDrive SUV

UltraGrip Performance+

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

23

1

3

Best position

#3

#1

#2

Average position

3.0

3.3

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

10

176

64

34

Wet

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Snow

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Snow handling

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Snow traction

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

98%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Snow braking

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Dry

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

69%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

94%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

94%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Ceat WinterDrive SUV vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

WinterDrive SUV

UltraGrip Performance+

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison