18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Ceat WinterDrive SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Test Profile

Ceat
WinterDrive SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Number of tests
1
3
23
Best position
#3
#2
#1
Average position
3.0
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
10
34
188

Wet

Wet
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
91%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Wet braking
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Wet circle cornering
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
68%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Wet handling
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
95%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%

Snow

Snow
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
95%

Dry

Dry
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Dry braking
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Dry handling
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Comfort
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Exterior noise
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%

Costs

Costs
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
94%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Rolling resistance
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
94%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison