18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Ceat SportDrive SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Ceat
SportDrive SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
1
3
3
Best position
#11
#2
#2
Average position
11.0
3.3
3.3
Latest test
2024
2026
2026
Available sizes
13
40
60

Offroad

Offroad
Ceat SportDrive SUV
70%

Wet

Wet
Ceat SportDrive SUV
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet braking
Ceat SportDrive SUV
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet circle cornering
Ceat SportDrive SUV
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet handling
Ceat SportDrive SUV
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Ceat SportDrive SUV
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Ceat SportDrive SUV
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Comfort
Ceat SportDrive SUV
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Exterior noise
Ceat SportDrive SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Dry

Dry
Ceat SportDrive SUV
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Ceat SportDrive SUV
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Ceat SportDrive SUV
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Costs

Costs
Ceat SportDrive SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
Ceat SportDrive SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison