Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Premium
Comparison: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive vs. Vredestein Quatrac
Table of contents:
| # | Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
| Vredestein Quatrac
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive vs Vredestein Quatrac — all-season tyre comparison
This head-to-head compares the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive and the Vredestein Quatrac across independent Autobild test results, real-world summaries and our lab ratings. If you’re searching for an all-season tyre comparison focused on wet braking, snow grip and overall safety, this summary highlights the key strengths and weaknesses and explains which tyre performed better overall.
Overview & ratings
Our ratings: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive — 45%; Vredestein Quatrac — 92%. In the major Autobild group test the Ceat finished 34th out of 35, while the Vredestein placed 2nd out of 35. These positions already signal a clear performance gap between the budget-oriented Ceat and the premium-oriented Vredestein.
What tests and summaries show
Autobild and subsequent test write-ups repeatedly emphasize that the Vredestein Quatrac is a true wet-weather specialist with excellent aquaplaning reserves, short wet and dry braking distances, agile handling and very good winter capabilities. Test notes call out dynamic handling, direct steering and a pleasant, quiet ride, with the main downside being only average treadwear. For more on the maker see Vredestein manufacturer info.
By contrast, the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive is presented as a budget all-season tyre with good mileage, low road noise and attractive price. However, testers repeatedly flag its limited winter performance — poor lateral guidance on snow and extended braking distances on wet surfaces. In Autobild tests these deficits pushed the Ceat near the bottom of the ranking. For manufacturer details see Ceat.
Strengths and weaknesses — quick summary
- Vredestein Quatrac — strengths: top wet handling, short wet/dry braking, strong aquaplaning resistance, balanced winter performance, low rolling resistance and comfortable noise levels.
- Vredestein Quatrac — weaknesses: only moderate longevity / average tread life in tests.
- Ceat 4 SeasonDrive — strengths: long mileage potential, quiet rolling and low price point.
- Ceat 4 SeasonDrive — weaknesses: poor snow lateral grip, extended braking on wet roads and generally weak winter safety metrics.
Mutual test positions — which is better?
Across the Autobild tests the Vredestein consistently beats the Ceat in every safety-relevant metric: wet braking, handling, aquaplaning and snow performance. With a 2nd place versus 34th place and a scoring gap of 92% vs 45%, the Vredestein is the clear winner for drivers who prioritise safety, all-weather performance and handling. The Ceat remains a budget option suited to mild climates where snow and heavy rain are rare and where initial cost and noise are top priorities.
Verdict
If tests and safety matter most, choose the Vredestein Quatrac — superior in wet conditions, capable in winter and highly ranked by Autobild. The Ceat 4 SeasonDrive is acceptable only as a cost-conscious compromise for predominantly dry, mild regions; avoid it where wet braking and snow grip are critical. Neither model shows a replacement listed in our data set, so both remain current options at the time of testing.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary2. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended2. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive | 38.6 | 47.4 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.3 | 43.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive | 40.8 | 50.1 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.3 | 45.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive | 44,9 | 63,7 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 41,7 | 47,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
