Comparison: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Ceat

4 SeasonDrive

6.3

R13 – R17

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

4 SeasonDrive

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

CrossClimate 2

ION Evo

Number of tests

4

3

24

1

Best position

#5

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

3.3

3.7

2.7

1.0

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

27

40

34

151

64

Wet

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet handling

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Snow

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

54%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow braking

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

63%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

Snow cornering

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

46%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

93%

Snow handling

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

46%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow traction

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

59%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Costs

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Mileage

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Price/value

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

89%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

43%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Rolling resistance

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Dry

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry handling

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Comfort

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

4 SeasonDrive

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

CrossClimate 2

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison