18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Ceat) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Ceat allround tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Kumho (55%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 74% compared to 72% of the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5. The first tyre test of Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 was done in 2025, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested.

Test Profile

Ceat
4 SeasonDrive X5
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
2
10
Best position
#4
#2
Average position
6.0
6.0
Latest test
2025
2026
Available sizes
104

Wet

Wet
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet handling
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Snow

Snow
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
72%

Dry

Dry
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry handling
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry braking
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Costs

Costs
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Price/value
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Rolling resistance
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Mileage
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Comfort
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Exterior noise
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison