18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

The following is a comparison of two summer touring tyres: Bridgestone Turanza T005 and Kumho Ecsta HS52. These tyres have been subject to various tests to determine their performance under different conditions.


Bridgestone Turanza T005


Manufactured in Hungary, Poland, France, and Italy by Bridgestone, the Turanza T005 is a high-performing tyre with an 89% rating on our scale. The T005 has consistently showcased strong performance in testing. Most notably, it claimed the top position in the Autobild test, dominated by its dry and wet braking, and wet handling capabilities. Additionally, it placed third and fourth in the Autoklub ČR and ADAC tests respectively, recognized for its impressive rolling resistance and wet cornering performance.


Bridgestone Turanza T005's noted strengths include a balanced drive on both dry and wet roads, high efficiency and a decent environmental footprint. However, the tyre's performance is slightly hindered by its reduced mileage.


Kumho Ecsta HS52


Developed by Kumho as a successor to the Ecsta HS51, the Ecsta HS52 has earned an 81% rating on our scale. Although it has not outperformed the Turanza T005 in any of the mentioned tests, it was placed third in Autobild test, excelling in areas such as dry braking and price-value offering. It also achieved the eighth position in the ADAC test.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52’s strengths lie in its balanced performance on both dry and wet roads, short dry and wet braking distances, comfort, and good price-to-performance ratio. On the downside, it was criticized for its delayed steering response and environmental impact, and lower efficiency and sustainability when compared with the Bridgestone Turanza T005.


Conclusion


After analyzing all the test results, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 appears to be the stronger performer overall. Although the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has commendable qualities and a good price-to-performance ratio, it lags behind in efficiency, environmental impact, and steering response. It's imperative to choose a tyre model that best suits your driving style and conditions.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
33
10
21
5
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
4.1
6.0
11.9
2.2
Latest test
2025
2026
2024
2025
Available sizes
658
104
164
63

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet side guide
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Wet performance
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry driving behavior
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
Dry performance
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Offroad

Offroad
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Grass traction
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Gravel traction
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Mud traction
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
76%
Sand traction
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
80%
Handling on gravel
Bridgestone Turanza T005
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
76%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Fuel efficiency
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Price/value
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison