18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Nokian Powerproof

The following is a comparison of two summer touring tyres: Bridgestone Turanza T005 and Kumho Ecsta HS52. These tyres have been subject to various tests to determine their performance under different conditions.


Bridgestone Turanza T005


Manufactured in Hungary, Poland, France, and Italy by Bridgestone, the Turanza T005 is a high-performing tyre with an 89% rating on our scale. The T005 has consistently showcased strong performance in testing. Most notably, it claimed the top position in the Autobild test, dominated by its dry and wet braking, and wet handling capabilities. Additionally, it placed third and fourth in the Autoklub ČR and ADAC tests respectively, recognized for its impressive rolling resistance and wet cornering performance.


Bridgestone Turanza T005's noted strengths include a balanced drive on both dry and wet roads, high efficiency and a decent environmental footprint. However, the tyre's performance is slightly hindered by its reduced mileage.


Kumho Ecsta HS52


Developed by Kumho as a successor to the Ecsta HS51, the Ecsta HS52 has earned an 81% rating on our scale. Although it has not outperformed the Turanza T005 in any of the mentioned tests, it was placed third in Autobild test, excelling in areas such as dry braking and price-value offering. It also achieved the eighth position in the ADAC test.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52’s strengths lie in its balanced performance on both dry and wet roads, short dry and wet braking distances, comfort, and good price-to-performance ratio. On the downside, it was criticized for its delayed steering response and environmental impact, and lower efficiency and sustainability when compared with the Bridgestone Turanza T005.


Conclusion


After analyzing all the test results, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 appears to be the stronger performer overall. Although the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has commendable qualities and a good price-to-performance ratio, it lags behind in efficiency, environmental impact, and steering response. It's imperative to choose a tyre model that best suits your driving style and conditions.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Nokian
Powerproof
Number of tests
33
10
23
11
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#2
Average position
4.1
6.0
6.6
7.5
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
2022
Available sizes
658
104
194
53

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
85%
Nokian Powerproof
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
85%
Nokian Powerproof
81%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
68%
Nokian Powerproof
86%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Nokian Powerproof
82%
Wet side guide
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
65%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Wet performance
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Nokian Powerproof
77%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
77%
Nokian Powerproof
83%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
77%
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Dry driving behavior
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
89%
Nokian Powerproof
66%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
88%
Nokian Powerproof
87%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
66%
Nokian Powerproof
78%
Dry performance
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Nokian Powerproof
72%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Nokian Powerproof
76%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Nokian Powerproof
64%
Comfort
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
67%
Nokian Powerproof
80%

Offroad

Offroad
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
72%
Nokian Powerproof
90%
Sand traction
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Nokian Powerproof
93%
Handling on gravel
Bridgestone Turanza T005
91%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
80%
Nokian Powerproof
100%
Grass traction
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
72%
Nokian Powerproof
95%
Gravel traction
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
72%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Mud traction
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
66%
Nokian Powerproof
81%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
64%
Nokian Powerproof
65%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
55%
Nokian Powerproof
70%
Mileage
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%
Nokian Powerproof
54%
Fuel efficiency
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Price/value
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Nokian Powerproof
50%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison