18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (59%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T001 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Bridgestone Turanza T001 has B wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 has A rating.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Turanza T001
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
12
15
Best position
#2
#2
Average position
6.8
9.0
Latest test
2017
2025
Available sizes
111
225

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Turanza T001
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Turanza T001
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Turanza T001
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Turanza T001
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Turanza T001
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Turanza T001
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Turanza T001
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Fuel efficiency
Bridgestone Turanza T001
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Mileage
Bridgestone Turanza T001
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Turanza T001
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Turanza T001
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Turanza T001
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Turanza T001
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry driving behavior
Bridgestone Turanza T001
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison