18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Bridgestone Turanza T001Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Turanza T001

R15 – R19
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Turanza T001
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
12
10
3
Best position
#2
#2
#2
Average position
6.8
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2017
2026
2025
Available sizes
111
104
34

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Turanza T001
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Turanza T001
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Turanza T001
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Turanza T001
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Turanza T001
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Turanza T001
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Turanza T001
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Turanza T001
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Bridgestone Turanza T001
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Turanza T001
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Turanza T001
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison