18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Bridgestone Turanza T001

Bridgestone

Turanza T001

VS

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato P7 C2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (59%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T001 was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Bridgestone Turanza T001 has B wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.

Test Profile

Bridgestone

Turanza T001

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

12

10

Best position

#2

#2

Average position

6.8

6.0

Latest test

2017

2026

Available sizes

111

104

Wet

Wet

Bridgestone Turanza T001

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Wet braking

Bridgestone Turanza T001

94%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Wet circle cornering

Bridgestone Turanza T001

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Bridgestone Turanza T001

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Wet handling

Bridgestone Turanza T001

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone Turanza T001

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Comfort

Comfort

Bridgestone Turanza T001

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

Bridgestone Turanza T001

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Dry

Dry

Bridgestone Turanza T001

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Costs

Costs

Bridgestone Turanza T001

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Mileage

Bridgestone Turanza T001

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison