18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Turanza T001
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
12
1
3
3
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#2
Average position
6.8
1.0
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2017
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
111
64
34
40

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Turanza T001
84%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Turanza T001
94%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Turanza T001
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Turanza T001
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Turanza T001
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Turanza T001
83%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Turanza T001
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Turanza T001
69%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Bridgestone Turanza T001
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Turanza T001
66%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Turanza T001
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison