18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Turanza T001
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
12
3
10
Best position
#2
#2
#2
Average position
6.8
3.3
6.0
Latest test
2017
2026
2026
Available sizes
111
40
104

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Turanza T001
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Turanza T001
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Turanza T001
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Turanza T001
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Turanza T001
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Turanza T001
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Turanza T001
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Turanza T001
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Bridgestone Turanza T001
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Turanza T001
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Turanza T001
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Turanza T001
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison