18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Turanza T001
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
12
3
5
1
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.8
3.7
2.2
1.0
Latest test
2017
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
34
63
64

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Turanza T001
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Turanza T001
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Turanza T001
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Turanza T001
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Turanza T001
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Turanza T001
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Turanza T001
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Turanza T001
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Turanza T001
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Turanza T001
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison