Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Bridgestone

Turanza T001

R15 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Turanza T001

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Number of tests

12

3

5

1

Best position

#2

#1

Average position

6.8

3.7

2.2

1.0

Latest test

2017

2025

Available sizes

111

34

63

64

Wet

Bridgestone Turanza T001

84%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Bridgestone Turanza T001

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet handling

Bridgestone Turanza T001

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone Turanza T001

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Bridgestone Turanza T001

94%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

Bridgestone Turanza T001

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Bridgestone Turanza T001

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Bridgestone Turanza T001

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dry

Bridgestone Turanza T001

89%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Costs

Bridgestone Turanza T001

69%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Turanza T001

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison