18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

The Bridgestone Turanza 6 and the Kumho Ecsta HS52 have been put through their paces in several tyre tests, revealing their strengths and weaknesses. Let's take a look at what the details say about these two summer tyres from renowned manufacturers Bridgestone and Kumho.


Both are strong contenders, with the Bridgestone Turanza 6 achieving an overall rating of 87% and the Kumho Ecsta HS52 scoring 81%. As a successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51, the HS52 improves upon its predecessor with enhancements mostly in handling and braking.


In a comparison by Autobild, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 fell in the 10th position out of 55 tyres tested. In contrast, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 shone brightly, taking the 2nd spot. The HS52 was particularly praised for its outstanding performance in dry and wet braking, along with excellent dry handling.


In another review, Autobild praised the Turanza 6's balanced driving capabilities, secure handling in wet and dry conditions, and short braking distances. The Turanza 6 was credited for its performance and longevity, outperforming many competitors.


ADAC's review added further insight to these tyres' performance. Out of 16 tyres tested, Bridgestone Turanza 6 claimed the 6th position while the Kumho Ecsta HS52 attained the 3rd position. The Bridgestone was recognized for its excellent resistance to aquaplaning, low interior noise, and durability.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52, on the other hand, was applauded for its mileage and excellent cornering on wet surfaces. However, a few weaknesses were pointed out in both tyres. The Bridgestone showed minor weaknesses in dry and wet surface handling whereas the Kumho had slight weaknesses in aquaplaning behavior and higher tyre weight.


To summarise, if you are after longevity, balanced driving, and secure handling, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 is a solid choice, despite minor issues with handling on different surfaces. For those prioritizing excellent dry and wet surface performance, high mileage, and budget-friendliness, choosing the Kumho Ecsta HS52 might be the better option.


Keep in mind that the right tyre for you depends on your specific driving conditions and requirements. Both tyres offer excellent value in their respective segments, indicative of the quality expected from manufacturers Bridgestone and Kumho.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
13
10
Best position
#2
#2
Average position
6.2
6.0
Latest test
2026
2026
Available sizes
225
104

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Turanza 6
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
65%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Turanza 6
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Turanza 6
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Turanza 6
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
62%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Turanza 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
93%

Offroad

Offroad
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Turanza 6
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Turanza 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
Comfort
Bridgestone Turanza 6
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
83%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2026225/50 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Summer
2024215/55 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison