Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Premium

Bridgestone

Turanza 6

VS

ION Evo

Ecsta HS52

7.4

R14 – R20

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Turanza 6

ION Evo

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

13

1

10

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

6.2

1.0

6.0

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

225

64

104

Wet

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet braking

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Aquaplaning - cross

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Wet handling

Bridgestone Turanza 6

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Wet circle cornering

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Dry

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry handling

Bridgestone Turanza 6

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Dry braking

Bridgestone Turanza 6

71%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Offroad

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Costs

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Rolling resistance

Bridgestone Turanza 6

79%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Mileage

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Comfort

Bridgestone Turanza 6

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

Bridgestone Turanza 6

65%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Comfort

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Turanza 6

ION Evo

Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Offroad

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison