Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Continental PremiumContact 7 — direct comparison of two leading summer tyres based on independent tyre tests. If you’re comparing dry and wet braking, handling, fuel economy and wear, this summary of test results and ratings helps decide which tyre suits your priorities.

Quick score: the Continental PremiumContact 7 carries an overall test rating of 98% versus the Bridgestone Turanza 6 at 77%. Explore the tyre pages: Bridgestone Turanza 6 and Continental PremiumContact 7. Manufacturer pages: Bridgestone and Continental.

Model status: Neither model is listed as replaced by a newer tyre in the supplied data (both continue from previous lines: Turanza 6 follows Turanza T005; PremiumContact 7 follows PremiumContact 6 / ContiPremiumContact 5).

Test summary and mutual positions

Across multiple independent test programs (ADAC, AUTO BILD, ACE, AutoZeitung, Automotorsport and others), the Continental PremiumContact 7 consistently ranks at or near the top — frequently 1st place in many tests, praised for best-in-class wet and dry braking, handling precision and overall safety reserves. The Bridgestone Turanza 6 performs solidly but places mid-table in most comparative tests (typical positions range from 4th to 16th depending on the test field). Where Bridgestone scores well it is usually for rolling resistance and fuel economy.

Strengths & weaknesses

• Continental PremiumContact 7 — Strengths: exceptional wet and dry performance, shortest braking distances in many tests, precise steering and dynamic handling, high comfort and very good mileage predictions. Test notes highlight it as overall test winner with “best driving characteristics” and large safety margins. Weaknesses: higher price, slightly louder rolling noise in some reports, and in a few tests a marginally higher rolling resistance or weight versus rivals.


• Bridgestone Turanza 6 — Strengths: low rolling resistance, excellent fuel economy, very good predicted mileages, comfortable ride and competent aquaplaning resistance (longitudinal). Tests note balanced summer profile and good wear. Weaknesses: noticeably behind Continental in ultimate wet grip, traction and high-demand cornering limits; some tests mention slight compromises on dry handling and traction under extreme conditions.

What the numbers mean

Continental’s near-universal top placements (ADAC test winner, ACE winner, AutoZeitung winner and multiple first places) show it is the benchmark for performance-focused drivers who prioritise braking distance and handling in both wet and dry conditions. Bridgestone’s Turanza 6 is aimed more at economy- and comfort-minded buyers who value low fuel consumption and long wear over outright sportiness.

Verdict

Overall winner: Continental PremiumContact 7. If you want the best all-round performance—especially shorter braking distances and superior wet/dry handling—Continental is the clear choice. Choose the Bridgestone Turanza 6 if your priorities are fuel efficiency, low rolling resistance and comfortable touring, and you accept somewhat lower limits in extreme wet/dry performance. Both are strong summer tyres; the decision comes down to performance vs economy.