Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Premium

Bridgestone

Potenza Sport Evo

VS

Pilot Sport 4 S

Ecsta PS71

8.3

R16 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Potenza Sport Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

2

10

15

Best position

#3

#1

#2

Average position

7.0

2.1

9.0

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

92

195

225

Wet

Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

77%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

67%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet braking

Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

97%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet handling

Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

76%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

84%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

45%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

85%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Dry

Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

90%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry braking

Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

97%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

95%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Dry handling

Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

88%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

96%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Comfort

Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

38%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

38%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Costs

Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

61%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Rolling resistance

Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

61%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Potenza Sport Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison