18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
5
1
5
Best position
#3
#1
#1
Average position
7.0
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2020
2025
2025
Available sizes
185
64
63

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Potenza S001
71%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Potenza S001
68%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Potenza S001
61%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Potenza S001
67%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Potenza S001
83%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Potenza S001
69%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Potenza S001
94%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Potenza S001
60%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Potenza S001
60%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Potenza S001
67%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Potenza S001
57%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison