18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Bridgestone

Potenza S001

VS

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Hankook (80%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Potenza S001 was done in 2015, compared to 2025 when was the Hankook ION Evo first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Bridgestone Potenza S001 has B wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Hankook ION Evo has A rating.

Test Profile

Bridgestone

Potenza S001

Hankook

ION Evo

Number of tests

5

1

Best position

#3

#1

Average position

7.0

1.0

Latest test

2020

2025

Available sizes

185

64

Wet

Wet

Bridgestone Potenza S001

71%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

Bridgestone Potenza S001

61%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

Bridgestone Potenza S001

67%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

Bridgestone Potenza S001

68%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone Potenza S001

82%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Dry

Dry

Bridgestone Potenza S001

82%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Bridgestone Potenza S001

69%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Comfort

Comfort

Bridgestone Potenza S001

60%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Bridgestone Potenza S001

60%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Costs

Costs

Bridgestone Potenza S001

67%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison