18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Potenza S001
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
3
3
Best position
#3
#2
#2
Average position
7.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2020
2026
2025
Available sizes
185
40
34

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Potenza S001
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Potenza S001
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Potenza S001
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Potenza S001
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Potenza S001
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Potenza S001
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Potenza S001
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Potenza S001
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Potenza S001
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Potenza S001
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Potenza S001
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Bridgestone Potenza S001
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison